LAS - Recent Validations - LAS

RE: LAS - Recent Validations

Futurist — Fri, 14 Jul 2023 21:37:35 +0000

Oh. Well, do they validate Latin American 108-109 year-olds like LAS did?

As far as I am aware, they do, yes.

So, if there's a 109-year-old Mexican-American woman who died in the 1990s whom I want verified, I should just contact LQ through the regular method?

RE: LAS - Recent Validations

Marco — Fri, 14 Jul 2023 21:36:22 +0000

Oh. Well, do they validate Latin American 108-109 year-olds like LAS did?

As far as I am aware, they do, yes.

RE: LAS - Recent Validations

Futurist — Fri, 14 Jul 2023 21:35:34 +0000

Worth noting that LAS verifies cases aged 108+ while LQ only verified cases aged 110+ to my knowledge, so there is still value in having LAS independently verify 108-109 year olds even if its 110+ year-olds work will be merged with LQ.

LQ validated the oldest (known) living barber, aged 106, a couple of weeks ago... so they also track people under the age of 110.

Oh. Well, do they validate Latin American 108-109 year-olds like LAS did?

RE: LAS - Recent Validations

Marco — Fri, 14 Jul 2023 21:34:53 +0000

LQ validated the oldest (known) living barber, aged 106, a couple of weeks ago... so they also track people under the age of 110.

RE: LAS - Recent Validations

Futurist — Fri, 14 Jul 2023 21:33:27 +0000

Hi Partizan.

Yes … LQ and LAS are one these days.

But LAS still had its website in place last time I looked and I think this may be intended to continue.

RE: LAS - Recent Validations

ChrisR — Fri, 14 Jul 2023 03:14:06 +0000

Hi Partizan.

Yes … LQ and LAS are one these days.

But LAS still had its website in place last time I looked and I think this may be intended to continue.

RE: LAS - Recent Validations

Partizan — Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:58:51 +0000

What Happened with LAS?

ESO continues to verify and publish oldest people But LAS no

I know about LongevyQuest but I don`t understand unless LQ has absorbed LAS

RE: LAS - Recent Validations

ChrisR — Tue, 21 Feb 2023 17:50:35 +0000

OK … so it appears the younger age of 114-206 still holds then.

Thank you Ale.

RE: LAS - Recent Validations

Ale76 — Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:35:58 +0000

New validated supercentenarian (28 Apr 2022):

Eleonora Camargo Veiga (14 Aug 1901-15 Mar 2016) 114 years, 214 days, of 🇧🇷 Brazil

Actually

Eleonora Camargo Veiga (14 Aug 1901-7 Mar 2016) 114 years, 206 days, of 🇧🇷 Brazil

RE: LAS - Recent Validations

Futurist — Fri, 17 Feb 2023 23:22:00 +0000

Apologies for asking this, but on the pending list for LAS, there are some cases where there is one check and some where there is two checks:

https://www.supercentenarios.org/las-personas-mas-longevas

I know what one check vs. two checks means, but because the Documentacion column is no longer split into two sub-columns, one can no longer see whether the check applies to the early-life documentation or to the later-life documentation. The Documentacion column used to be split into two sub-columns but is no longer for whatever reason.