Age 120+ for a future validated female SC is more likely, IMHO. Denmark recently had its second male SC and its first one in 32 years, after all, and age 110 for Danish-born men is roughly comparable to age 120 for the world's oldest living people.

It’s also worth note that unless a spectacular new validation occurs,  JC is already guaranteed to be “the greatest of them all all” on her 155th birthday.

And probably will still hold this title on her 160th.

... paraphrasing what Jeanne allegedly said on her 122nd birthday

Maria Branyas Morera, was described as having very high quality cells - but not many of them now, given her extreme age.

By conparison her daughter (in her 80s) has lower quality cells but a lot more of them. The reason for the lower quality is likely due to her father’s DNA input, mixing with Maria’s DNA and logically diluting Maria’s high quality input:

The real frustration, from a medical perspective, is why (or how) did Maria’s mum and dad’s DNA combine to produce such a wonderful outcome in María?

Sadly it’s far too late to test for that, as both are of course, long gone.

The research work, which identifies VALIDATED super centenarians, is then used for respectful medical purposes - to try and understand why some people are largely immune from the things that get most of us, well before 110.

That’s also why the data integrity remains so important - and why the GRG senior personnel are not only allegedly stealing data from other researchers, but also compromising the medical process - through poor validations - apparently just for personal image reasons.

The so called leader now, describes himself as a scientist (when I’ve met with him), yet based on the significant evidence provided to date … appears to be acting rather differently.

It’s also why medical experts are so keen to look at their DNA, cell samples and other test criteria.

The aim is to understand WHY they live so long and why can’t we all do that.