Well yeah, GRG is not very reliable these days.

Intriguing remark from someone who often posts comments on the GRG fan forum and vigorously edits the Gerontology Wiki in favour of a "not very reliable" organisation.

Yes OK, I know I technically edit the GRG wiki when LQ is not mentioned at all because of these stupid rules the GRG made but I'm not doing it because I'm a 'fan' of the GRG, I'm just doing it because it's the most up to date wiki. I never said that I was editing the wiki because I'm a fan of the GRG and I never wanted to say that Barbara Rawlin should be a high level validation. I never meant to cause drama here.

I don't see any drama here?

There are other longevity Wikis that can also be made up-to-date where LQ- and ESO-validations ARE displayed.

@marco in all fairness, those other wikis are much further behind in terms of content.

That's true, I suppose.

Recent validation, accepted on 1 February 2025:

Elizabeth Philippina van Boven-Smaal, NED, 5 Jan 1915 - Present, 110+years.

Recent validation, accepted on 4 February 2025:

[Private], UK/CAN, 17 Jan 1914 - Present, 111+ years.

Recent validation, accepted on 17 February 2025:

Pete Traut, RUS/USA, 3 Nov 1875 - 21 Jan 1986, 110 years and 79 days.