@sailor-haumea yes but keep in mind I’m personally only looking into centenarians from the North East of England.
The other interesting thing about Blaze Driver is that he lived across 3 different centuries.
I'm sure this has happened for quite a few hundred years now as the required age to achieve isn't that high (if your birth year ends in say 96-99). But we still don't know too many whose birth predates the 1700s.
four verified centenarians born before 1750
Was Margaret Turnbull debunked?
According to Durham Records Online, there was a Margaret Turnbull born in 1774 at Hunwick who may have been the Margaret Turnbull who died at Hunwick in 1776.
four verified centenarians born before 1750
Was Margaret Turnbull debunked?
According to Durham Records Online, there was a Margaret Turnbull born in 1774 at Hunwick who may have been the Margaret Turnbull who died at Hunwick in 1776.
I haven't been able to reach a conclusive decision regarding her. Turnbull was/is a very common surname in the North East of England. My mother has two aunts and both married different men with the surname Turnbull, just to give some perspective lol.
I am on the cusp of verifying another early centenarian case:
Dorothy Buttiman (nee Common), bapt 15 March 1745, died 30 September 1851 (aged 106)
Investigation notes attached below:
I'll take some time to review everything again before verifying, but all the evidence seems to match up very nicely.
While researching my family tree, I stumbled upon the death record of an Elizabeth Holder, who died in the first quarter (Jan/Feb/Mar) of 1860 allegedly aged 101. The registration district of death is Dursley, Gloucestershire, England. I decided to research further to see if she really was an early centenarian.
Her burial record states she was buried on 2 April 1860 at Holy Cross in Owlpen, very close to Dursley, so she probably died in late March.
Find My Past gave me a match for her 1851 census record:
| First name(s) | Last name | Relationship | Marital status | Sex | Age | Birth year | Occupation | Birth place |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betty | Holder | Head | Widow | Female | 91 | 1760 | Pauper weaver wool | Owlpen, Gloucestershire, England |
| Sarah | Holder | Daughter | Unmarried | Female | 66 | 1785 | Pauper weaver wool | Owlpen, Gloucestershire, England |
I then found her daughter Sarah's baptism record, which confirms she was baptised in Owlpen on 20 March 1785. Her parents were James and Elizabeth Holder. Using this information, I looked to see if Elizabeth had other children:
* Mary - bap. 17 Jan 1790
* Richard - bap. 17 Jan 1790
* Richard - bap. 23 Feb 1794
* James - bap. 16 Apr 1797
* Richard - bap. 2 Apr 1802
* William - bap. 2 Apr 1802 (born 1798 according to Find My Past transcript)
* Rachael - bap. 2 May 1805
Seeing that Sarah is the oldest child, it's likely that James and Elizabeth were married a short time before her birth. Bearing this in mind, I was able to find a likely marriage record. Elizabeth Shipton married James Holder on 29 August 1784 in Uley, a village right next door to Owlpen.
Next step - looking for a baptism record. There are 2 possible matches in Uley:
* Elizabeth Shipton - bap. 25 Dec 1761, parents John and Mary
* Elizabeth Shipton - bap. 5 Sep 1762, mother Mary. After further research, I found a record that confirmed this Elizabeth was buried on 12 April 1765.
This means that Elizabeth Holder was likely "only" 98 when she died. Not a centenarian, but still a very good age for that time. Only exaggerated by a couple of years, and probably not deliberately, but still shows the importance of the validation process.
I found the burial record of Mary Jane Turner, who was buried in Ditchling, East Sussex, England, on 19 September 1857 with an age given of 100 years, 8 months.
I found her 1851 census, which shows her as unmarried, and from a well-to-do family since her nephew was a rector, her great-nephew was a student at Oxford University, and she also had housemaids.
| Mary Jane | Turner | Head | Unmarried | Female | 94 | 1757 | Landed proprietor and fundholder | Keymer, Sussex, England |
| Edward | Turner | Nephew | Married | Male | 56 | 1795 | Rector of maresfield sussex | Westmeston, Sussex, England |
| Elizabeth | Turner | Niece | Married | Female | 57 | 1794 | Wife of the preceding | Keymer, Sussex, England |
| Thomas Richard | Turner | Grand nephew | Unmarried | Male | 21 | 1830 | Son of the preceding and commoner queens colledge oxford | Nuthurst, Sussex, England |
| Amy | Moon | Visitor | Married | Female | 58 | 1793 | Wife of a retired porter living at brightain | Edburton, Sussex, England |
| Esther | Wood | Servant | Unmarried | Female | 28 | 1823 | House servant cook | Maresfield, Sussex, England |
| Sarah | Stevens | Servant | Unmarried | Female | 16 | 1835 | House servant kitchenmaid | Ditchling, Sussex, England |
As she was unmarried, her case may not be able to be verified to the rigorous standards required, but I was able to find a baptism record which matches the 1851 census.
A Mary Jane Turner, daughter of William and Sarah, was baptised on 25 January 1757 in Keymer, which also fits nicely with the age given on the death certificate. Just to be more certain, I checked her nephew Edward's ancestry. He was baptised on 8 July 1794 in Westmeston as the son of Richard and Jane Turner. Mary Jane did have a brother named Richard, baptised 14 June 1763.
If the baptism record is a match, then Mary Jane Turner can be considered an early centenarian, with a lifespan of c.25 January 1757 - c.19 September 1857, or 100 years, c.228 days.
Here's another claim I found a while back:
Margaret Thornton Clarke died on 7 March 1864 at 2 Pine Cottage in Blackheath, London, at the claimed age of 106. Her obituary notice as printed in the 12 March 1864 edition of The Sun (this newspaper, not the modern one):
The only other contemporary mention of her I can find in newspapers is a small notice from 1849 looking for her next of kin for probate purposes, which also noted she lived in Wapping at the time (about 6 miles away from Blackheath). With this information in mind, let's try to find her in censuses:
1861 census: Margaret is listed at age 103 living at 2 Pine Cottage, listed as a 'boarder'. Notably, the census provides her birthplace as being Aldgate. The head of the household is Aberdeen-born Jessie Till, aged 60.
1851 census: Margaret is listed at age 93 at 5 Pier Head, Wapping, listed as a 'visitor'. A Scottish-born Jessie Till, aged 51, is listed as a servant - confirming that this is definitely the same person. Besides this, it's worth noting that the head of household is 79-year-old Kitty Walton.
1841 census: Margaret is listed at age 80 at 5 Pier Head, Wapping. 70-year-old Kitty Walton is once again listed as the head of the household, and 40-year-old Scottish-born Jessie Till is a servant. The ages of everyone on the form is rounded - so Margaret being a few years younger than expected isn't too concerning here.
So we have a pretty comprehensive view of Margaret's later years, but the main setback is that no-one on these forms seems to be explicitly related to her. Let's see if we can find anything from Margaret's earlier years:
1758 baptism record: Margaret Thornton Clarke, daughter of Samuel and Susanna Clarke of Houndsditch, was baptised at St Botolph's Aldgate on 8 February 1758.
This seems like a perfect match at first glance. Firstly though, let's try to rule out a potential identity switch by looking for all the children born to Samuel and Susanna Clarke of Houndsditch:
Elizabeth Clarke, bap. 12 Dec 1753
Joseph Clarke, bap. 12 Nov 1755
Margaret Thornton Clarke, bap. 8 Feb 1758
Edward Clarke, bap. 16 Jan 1760
William Clarke, bap. 2 Jul 1762
Susanna Clarke, bap. 13 Jun 1766, bur. 18 Nov 1766
Jonathan Clarke, bap. 2 Sep 1768
Given that Margaret only had one younger sister who died at the age of 6 months this would seem to eliminate the possibility of the Margaret Clarke who died in 1864 being a younger sibling (the only potential issue being the larger-than-usual gap between William and Susanna's births, but in my eyes using this as evidence against the case is going far beyond healthy skepticism).
Unfortunately, none of these records mention Susanna's maiden name. The only potential marriage record I can find is between Samuel Clarke and Susanna Wilkins on 21 Jun 1747 in the nearby church of St Botolph's Bishopsgate. If this is the correct record, it would leave a gap of 6 years between the date of marriage and their first known child (though perhaps the baptisms of any children in the meantime simply weren't recorded?) - either way I wouldn't be willing to fully hedge my bets on this being the correct record just yet.
This leaves us with the largest issue with the case - Margaret's life between childhood and old age. Census records don't really give us enough information here - for instance we don't know what her occupation was, nor the nature of how she came to live with Kitty Walton. I'm reminded of Elizabeth Gray (1748-1856) a bit, although in that case there are enough records pertaining to her family to form a more conclusive link between the person born in 1748 and dying in 1856.
Would be curious to know everyone else's thoughts on this!
A couple of days ago, I stumbled upon this newspaper article from 1936 that mentions 'Antje Jans', a woman that reportedly was baptized on 22 December 1654 in Leeuwarden, Friesland and died in the same place on 11 March 1762 at the claimed age of 107 years and 79 days.
Franeker Courant, 24 July 1936 (source: Delpher.nl)
Translation: 'Antje Jans, a widow, died on 11 March 1762 in Leeuwarden, at the age of over 107 years. She was baptized there on 22 December 1654, and became a member of the Reformed Church on 27 May 1681. She was able to see in life, children, grandchildren's children, and of the latter not only children, but even grandchildren's children. She was fortunate enough to be the oldest person from the aforementioned city, as well as the oldest member of the Reformed Church there. The said woman was of sound mind until the end of her life. She was buried on the 19th (of May) at the Jacobiner Kerkhof among a large crowd of people. (To be continued.) A. H.'
After doing a little research, this is what I found so far:
First, her date of death. I found a confirmation of her date on 11 March 1762 on AlleFriezen.nl:
Second, her membership of the Reformed Church. I found her 1681 membership of the Reformed Church on FamilySearch (page 85):
Finally, her date of birth. I found a 1654 baptism register of the city of Leeuwarden on FamilySearch as well. Despite 'Antje Jans' not being mentioned to have been baptized on 22 December, I did found the name of somebody that has been baptized on 17 December that looks a lot like 'Antje Jans' (page 142):
Any thoughts on this case?
Angelina Willette claimed birth on 8 Oct 1819 and died on 11 March 1929 at the age of 109 years old.
There is a matching baptismal record that can be found in the Drouin Collection [on ancestry here].
However, the marriage record between her and her husband is still missing. There are some other records on familysearch that seem to piece together a life story, but there is still a decent gap between her birth and appearance in the 1850 census.
If her age is indeed true, then she would be the WOLP between Delena Filkins (died 4 Dec 1928) and Katherine Plunket (22 Nov 1820 - 14 Oct 1932).
I did a bit of digging into early New Zealand centenarians recently and was able to find 6 cases of people born before 1850 who reached 105+ in New Zealand with documentation proving their age:
I'm also working on redoing that early centenarians spreadsheet from a while back. I feel like when all is said and done there's probably more than 1000 cases of people born before 1850 reaching 105+ whose ages can be validated, but for many from countries without publicly available death indexes it's just being able to identify them - you sort of just have to hope you stumble into a news article/family tree/etc!
I find New Zealand to be quite under-researched. I've been working on building the chronological OLP and OLM lists over on the GW. I'm also working on a little project to try and identify every person in NZ 107 or older, and every man 105 or older. Still a lot to do but it is gradually looking more complete as it goes on.
This is a list of all the English centenarians (by birth or death) born before 1800 I could verify.
Asterisks represent baptism or burial dates. Pluses represent births or deaths outside of england.
All below dates are listed in the Gregorian calendar.
This list does not accurately represent Welsh-born centenarians on account of my lack of access to Welsh parish register scans.
Here is a list of Welsh and Scottish centenarians I found.
@fish Incredible work! Interesting to see a documented 105-year-old as early as 1820; displacing Dorothy Buttiman as the earliest known person in the UK to reach that age.
@robbie Thanks!
By the way, there may have been a 109-year-old in the UK as early as 1855.
(All below dates are in Gregorian format.)
Elizabeth Parker (née Hulbert?) of Biddlestone, Wiltshire. She died on 9 June 1855 aged "107" years. It is noted that she served the family of a Mr. T. Little for many years. (Coincidentally, she shares an obituary with William Warner, who I have listed above.)
1851 Census: widow (formerly basket maker's wife), age 103, born in Biddlestone. She is visiting a friend, 80-year-old Elizabeth Stickler, in Slaughterford, Wiltshire.
1841 Census: age 85, enumerated in Slaughterford with 60-year-old Jane Workman.
Surprisingly, there are only two matching marriages in the Biddestone parish registers available to me.
Charles Parker + Elizabeth Giddings(?) : 12 April 1797
William Parker + Elizabeth Hulbert, both residing in Berwick St James : 8 December 1771
There are no traces of Charles and Elizabeth save for the former's baptism in Biddlestone on 7 July 1771, and thus cannot be researched further.
William and Elizabeth had 4 children:
Robert: baptized 7 January 1773; married Martha Brown in Biddlestone on 17 November 1800.
William: baptized 17 December 1775; married Ann Smith (1780-1858) 27 November 1797; died 8 July 1852, all in Biddlestone.
Sarah: baptized 8 November 1778 and buried 14 July 1840 in Biddlestone.
Ann: baptized 1 April 1785 and buried 11 January 1785 in Biddlestone.
William Sr. was buried 18 March 1798 aged 52.
As for Elizabeth Hulbert:
Her parents were Robert Hulbert (1716*-1764*) and Sarah Weekes, who married in Biddletone on 27 September 1771.
They had three children:
Ann: baptized 3 February 1743 at Biddlestone; married Robert Newman (1741-1827) at Corsham, where she was buried on 20 January 1816.
Elizabeth: baptized 5 December 1745 in Biddlestone.
John: baptized 14 September 1749 in Biddlestone.
The main issue with her case is that there is nothing conclusively linking her to the 1771 marriage.
Her gravestone or civil death record may provide the information necessary to debunk or verify her case.
Her gravestone or civil death record may provide the information necessary to debunk or verify her case.
Her death record lists her husband as Thomas Parker so it seems neither of these Elizabeths are the one who died in 1855.
Unfortunately, England+Wales death records (especially from over 100 years ago) are incredibly scant in details - in fact even on modern ones parents' names aren't recorded. Elizabeth Parker's death record doesn't even list her maiden name, so if a matching baptism does exist it's likely not linkable to the woman who died in 1855.
Her death record lists her husband as Thomas Parker so it seems neither of these Elizabeths are the one who died in 1855.
I presume there is no specified relationship for the informant for Elizabeth's death.
There was a Thomas Parker born in Biddlestone on 25 June 1787, who was apparently the son of William and Elizabeth.
I found no evidence of any Thomas Parker marrying or having children in Biddestone with an Elizabeth.
The closest I found was the family of Thomas and Elizabeth Packer of nearby Chippenham.
Here is a list of all the centenarians from New England born prior to 1730 I could verify.
All dates are listed in the Gregorian calendar. Births in England are denoted with a plus.
I've observed a few common traits reported among many of these early centenarians:
1. Life-long good health.
2. Total preservation of cognitive function.
3. Death after a short illness.
4. A calm, gentle demeanor.
5. Avoidance of alcohol and/or tobacco.
I just came across this particularly early French case.
Marguerite Desnos was born 28 July 1608 (baptized on the 31st) in Saint-Malo (Ille-et-Vilaine), and died in the same city on 26 January 1713 (buried on the 28th) aged 104 years, 182 days.
She was the 5th of nine children born to the nobleman Christophe Desnos, lord of La Guimorais (with reserves), and Jeanne de Beaubois, who married in Saint-Malo on 14 January 1596.
The rest of the Desnos children were:
• Gillette (1600-1624)
• Guillaume (1601)
• Jean (1603-1681)
• Jeanne (1607)
• Christophe (1611)
• Charles (1613)
• Jeanne (1615)
• Thomas (1616)
She married on 22 August 1632 in Saint-Malo with Olivier Béard (1597-1654), sieur des Bassières (Allée des Bassières, located in Saint-Servan, Saint-Malo).
Olivier happened to be a nephew of Olivier Péle, sieur de La Richardais, who died in 1675 at the age of 100.
They had 7 children, all born in Saint-Malo.
Guillemette (1633)
Christophe (1635)
Jacques (1638)
Collette (1641)
Pierre (1645)
Bernard, sieur du Désert (1648-1736)
The 1713 burial refers to Marguerite as "Dame Marguerite Desnos des Bassiéres", linking her to the 1632 marriage, in which her husband is recorded as "Olivier Béard, honorable homme sieur des Bassiéres".
The only matching contemporary baptism in Saint-Malo is the one recorded for the daughter of Christophe Desnos in 1608.
Thus, it appears that Marguerite Desnos is the second earliest known centenarian from France (and Saint-Malo)!
@fish Amazing work, Fish, how impressive that you found a centenarian born in the early 17th century!
ESO Correspondent for Portugal (since 2026)
____
When the young commander of the guard declared his love for her, she rejected him simply because his frivolity startled her. "See how simple he is," she told Amaranta. "He says that he’s dying because of me, as if I were a bad case of colic."
-One Hundred Years of Solitude
Thank you Fish. That's a great discovery.
A death report in the press. The dates of birth and death are almost correct:
"Marguerite Desnos, widow of Mr. des Bassieres Beard of Saint-Malo, died on 26 January 1713, aged 104 years 6 months, being born on 28 July 1608, and having retained her judgment until her death".
That means the 1st, 2nd and 6th earliest French centenarians all died in Saint-Malo.
@guillaume If you don't mind me asking, who are the 3rd, 4th, and 5th earliest French centenarians?
I've always been particularly fascinated by early centenarians - the people who lived to extreme ages at a time when many of the comforts and tools we now have and use in everyday life hadn't been invented or weren't available, and the study of extreme longevity had yet to really begin.
I was amazed to find a portrait of Elizabeth Gray (11 May 1748 – 2 Apr 1856) which was posted in a Facebook group. I researched her claim back in 2019 on the 110 Club; to sum up there is early and late-life evidence to support her case, and a fairly complete family tree, but in my view it's unlikely that enough mid-life evidence would exist to verify her claim with the rigor of today's cases. Nevertheless, with a family history of longevity (her mother and two of her siblings would probably also have been within the 50 oldest living people in Scotland at the time of their deaths) I personally think it's fairly likely her claim is true.
Her age was actually the subject of investigation 142 years ago. I'm not sure if you've seen this, but her great-nephew wrote to the London Spectator to correct a printed statement that the oldest age proven had been 106.
Olivier Péle
His sister, Bernardine, died in 1668 at the age of 95. Their father, Olivier le jeune, died in 1609 just shy of 81.