@dejan's two warnings have been reduced to one after having shown signs of improved behaviour.
@admin please see https://globalsupercentenarianforum.com/index.php/community/eso/eso-recent-validations/paged/5/#post-9518
Coincidentally, less than 24 hours after the above announcement, it was presented with reasons why we think the above post should be reconsidered...
Born 3 Feburuary 1999. Founder of 5ch anonymous message board about longevity (1 January 2012) / Founder and chief administrator, the oldest people research forum in Japan founded in 1 January 2017. Link: 長寿者研究フォーラム (oldestpeopleforum.jp)
@record_116 But his behaviour on the Global Supercentenarian Forum does not have anything to do with how he has operated for validation organisations. I don't think it would be fair to punish him here for behaviour he has shown elsewhere. (Remember, last year he was appropriately warned for his lying and deceiving on the GSCF, so such measures have already been in place here.)
Alright, thanks very much for the explanation.
Born 3 Feburuary 1999. Founder of 5ch anonymous message board about longevity (1 January 2012) / Founder and chief administrator, the oldest people research forum in Japan founded in 1 January 2017. Link: 長寿者研究フォーラム (oldestpeopleforum.jp)
Milanq has been very strict on gerontology wiki. He also deleted every single post that is not helpful to the wiki
Milanq has been very strict on gerontology wiki. He also deleted every single post that is not helpful to the wiki
No forum is a source, kids don't understand what is necessary and what is not necessary on Gerontology Wiki, therefore they tried to create fake articles, and as a source they cited a link to a GSF post by Aquanaut which is not a reliable source. Nothing bad about GSF as a forum, but no other forum is a reference.
@billy-robinson and @MrCatlord, please don't create fake articles from unreliable sources, you are both registered on Gerontology Wiki, so try to contribute to Gerontology Wiki, not be provocateurs and not deal with what someone wrote where. More here on Gerontology Wiki: https://globalsupercentenarianforum.com/index.php/community/fans-discussion/gerontology-wiki/
Lately, one person with multiple accounts has been propagating something unnecessary on GW, the people who manage those accounts are unknown.
Why people hate me so much, why they think negatively about me, I really don't know. I just want to try to save the Gerontology Wiki from obsolescence, I see it's impossible, instead of helping me, they accuse me. Anyone who is not interested in the Gerontology wiki is under no obligation to edit anything, nor should they retaliate by creating a bunch of new two-sentence articles without any important information. I'm not going to bother myself with mass writing new articles after someone, mainly about false claims, I can finish the matter with one click.
If there is a thread on The 110 Club where there is propaganda against the Gerontology Wiki, there is no need to continue it here...
I know that many are in an unpleasant situation that GW recognizes only GRG, validations, but don't blame me for that, I don't participate in it at all, I deal with other updates, and other users, instead of helping me, they retaliate against me.
@billy-robinson and @MrCatlord, please don't create fake articles from unreliable sources, you are both registered on Gerontology Wiki, so try to contribute to Gerontology Wiki, not be provocateurs and not deal with what someone wrote where.
Please don't tell others what to do on the Global Supercentenarian Forum (or elsewhere) and what not; you're not above any other member here.
I am also not sure who you think you are telling others what to do and what not when you're still "a kid" yourself who has been exposed for creating fake and false documentation for supercentenarian claimants. Something with a pot and a kettle.
I have not written anything negative about GSF as a forum anywhere, but I have warned other users on the Gerontology Wiki not to create fake articles from unreliable sources that this forum user "Aquanaut" told them about. He also told other children's on Gerontology Wiki what to do. I am not commanding anyone anywhere, just not allowing fake articles from unreliable sources to be created on Gerontology Wiki. Anyone who doesn't like the Gerontology Wiki is under no obligation to edit or visit it at all, but they don't need to cause further trouble by creating articles about false claims.
@billy-robinson, you posted a screenshot of a (now deleted) comment from Gerontology Wiki, and you expect to achieve something with it, you think you'll be able to motivate the Admin to block me, there's no point because I know I no wrong doing here on the forum, nothing negative anywhere.
The rules of this forum are that no one can be blocked until they commit enough violations, I have two warnings from before, I don't need a third violation, and I know some would like that. There should be no dictatorship here, my account was blocked on The 110 Club for unknown reasons, absolutely for no reason, I never wrote anything negative there...
I, Aquanaut_Chalk admit that I was the one who told Billy Robinson to post that screenshot. So @dejan, if you want to blame someone, blame me. Leave Billy alone. Someone sent me that screenshot via social media, and I asked Billy to post it. It wasn't right of me to ask him to post it, but I also don't think it's right calling the gsf an "unreliable source". You act like you're part of our community and contribute, but on other forums you criticize and bash the gsf. My intention was hoping that by other people reading that screenshot, they would realize you are backstabbing this community and approach talking to you with caution, because I have seen you manipulate people. I wanted to protect fellow members of this forum from being manipulated by you, the way you manipulated me.
- A.C.
|Male| 🎮Gamer🎮 > 👕Fashion Lover👕 > 🕶Chore Motivator🕶
Favorite Male SC: Juan Vicente Pérez Mora
Favorite Female SCs: Lucile Randon & Kane Tanaka
😁And the kind of guy that's always down to chat😁
also don't think it's right calling the gsf an "unreliable source".
The forum is not a reliable source (reference), not only the GSF, but also other forums, because the forums are dedicated to researchers having a discussion about supercentenarians. It is not a source, the original source is needed, not your or my GSF post.
I just wanted to say, a member has recently told me in the private chat, something that I find very disturbing and I feel I need to make this known to an admin.
|Male| 🎮Gamer🎮 > 👕Fashion Lover👕 > 🕶Chore Motivator🕶
Favorite Male SC: Juan Vicente Pérez Mora
Favorite Female SCs: Lucile Randon & Kane Tanaka
😁And the kind of guy that's always down to chat😁
... sorry for that long rant, it was a stupid post, and I shouldn't have started drama. Well it's over now
|Male| 🎮Gamer🎮 > 👕Fashion Lover👕 > 🕶Chore Motivator🕶
Favorite Male SC: Juan Vicente Pérez Mora
Favorite Female SCs: Lucile Randon & Kane Tanaka
😁And the kind of guy that's always down to chat😁